AI workspace for legal matters

Open a matter. Ask anything. Cite everything.

A research chat and a review table, grounded in the files of one matter. Every answer shows the exact excerpt it came from.

Get started

Plans from $170/month Cancel anytime LawGPT for Word included

No training

Your matters never leave your workspace.

Documents and prompts are never used to train our models or anyone else's. Not now. Not later. Written into the DPA.
Matter-scoped

Isolation is the default, not a setting.

Every matter is walled off. No cross-client mixups, no lateral reads, no shared embeddings. Role-based access per matter.
Your data, your rules

Export everything. Delete anytime.

CSV for reviews, original files for documents, a full audit log for the whole workspace. Workspace deletion is immediate and irreversible.

I. The default mode

Ask with context. Get answers with receipts.

Every matter has its own research chat, grounded in the files you pick and filtered by the tags you set. Pull the web in when you need current law. Notes sit one tab away. Every answer lands with numbered citations; click one and the exact source excerpt opens inline.

Helios–Atlas merger · Change-of-control

Rename Delete

Walk me through every material contract in the Atlas data room that has a change-of-control clause triggered by the Helios acquisition. Flag which ones require counterparty consent, which accelerate, and which give the counterparty a termination right.

Planned 4 steps · Used 6 tools

Eleven of the 58 material contracts in the data room contain a change-of-control provision that Helios's acquisition would trigger. By category:

Consent required (6): Westfield MSA, Redline supply agreement, Marigold licensing, and three lender consents on the 2023 credit facility. 12
Automatic acceleration (3): Series C notes accelerate at 101% on any >50% ownership change; two equipment leases trigger balloon payments. 3
Termination at counterparty option (2): Marigold and Kestrel both have 30-day unilateral termination windows post-closing. 4

4 sources · 11 contracts

Ask a question about your documents…

Attach Sources Web

1Westfield_MSA_executed.pdf 2Redline_supply_agreement.pdf 3SeriesC_note_purchase.pdf 4Marigold_license_v4.pdf

1 Change of Control. Any transaction in which more than fifty percent (50%) of the voting securities of Licensee are transferred to a third party shall require the prior written consent…

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

  14.  ASSIGNMENT AND CHANGE OF CONTROL

  14.1 Assignment. Neither Party may assign
       this Agreement, in whole or in part,
       without the prior written consent of
       the other Party, such consent not to
       be unreasonably withheld or delayed.

  14.2 Change of Control. Any transaction
       or series of related transactions in
       which more than fifty percent (50%)
       of the voting securities of Licensee
       are transferred to, or otherwise come
       under the control of, a third party
       shall be deemed an assignment of this
       Agreement and shall require the prior
       written consent of Licensor.

  14.3 Acceleration. Upon a Change of
       Control without Licensor consent,
       all unpaid minimum royalties for the
       then-current Term shall accelerate
       and become immediately due and
       payable in full within thirty (30)
       days of the triggering event.

II. Approved for Microsoft Word

The matter follows you into Word.

LawGPT for Word puts the record in the drafting margin: chat, notes, files, selection-aware rewrites, and Fact Check against the evidence you already reviewed.

Get LawGPT for Word Support details

Word on the web · Windows · Mac

Plaintiff's Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment - DRAFT

Smith v. Acme Logistics, Inc. - Civil Action No. 24-CV-08217-MAS-DEA Draft v.3 - work in progress

I. Introduction

The undisputed record establishes that Defendant Acme Logistics breached the Warehousing Services Agreement between the parties in at least two independent and material respects.

This Court should grant summary judgment to Plaintiff on the question of liability and reserve damages for trial.

II. Statement of Facts

The parties executed the Warehousing Services Agreement on July 1, 2024. The Agreement obligated Defendant to provide 14,000 square feet of climate-controlled warehouse space and to release inventory within 48 hours of any written request.

Between July and September 2024, Plaintiff fulfilled all monthly storage obligations under the Agreement, paying a total of $187,400 in storage fees without interruption.

LawGPT for Word

Smith v. Acme WORD

Chat Library Refine

Selection: 50 words

The parties executed the Warehousing Services Agreement on July 1, 2024. The Agreement obligated Defendant to provide warehouse space and release inventory within 48 hours.

Fact Check All matter sources

Partially grounded: 5 facts

Supported: 3

The Agreement required release within 48 hours. Provider shall release inventory pursuant to a written request within forty-eight hours. 03-Warehousing-Services-Agreement.docx

Plaintiff stored consumer electronics worth approximately $3.1 million. With an aggregate wholesale value of approximately $3,100,000. 01-Complaint.docx

Contradicted: 1

The parties executed the Agreement on July 1, 2024. The agreement states July 5, 2024, not July 1, 2024. 03-Warehousing-Services-Agreement.docx

LawGPT for Word shown with a selected brief paragraph and matter-grounded Fact Check results.

01 Highlight
Select the paragraph you are drafting or checking.
02 Refine or audit
Rewrite, formalize, tighten, or run Fact Check.
03 Insert with context
Use matter answers, notes, and files without leaving Word.

III. When you need scale

One question. Every document. Answered in parallel.

Review is a spreadsheet where every column is a question (text, yes/no, or date) and every row is a document in the matter. The AI fills the grid. You audit the edge cases and export to CSV.

Privilege review, first pass

Completed 412 documents · 2 columns

824/824

Add Column Add Documents Export CSV Run

File Responsive Y/N Privilege basis Text

2024_Board_Minutes_Q3.pdf Yes. addresses the disputed Apex acquisition vote Attorney-client

FW_ litigation_hold_notice.eml Yes. directs counsel on preservation scope; attorney-client Attorney-client

Vendor_invoice_apex_9021.pdf No. routine invoice, no nexus to the disputed transaction —

Patel_expense_report_Oct.xlsx No. reimbursements only, no subject-matter overlap —

Memo_re_non_compete_v4.docx Yes. drafted after the trigger event, cites Labor Code 16600 Work product

IT_onboarding_checklist.pdf No. generic template, not case-specific —

Re_ settlement_framework_draft.msg Yes. discusses settlement strategy with outside counsel Common-interest

Press_release_FY24.pdf Yes. public statement referenced in the complaint —

Office_seating_chart.pdf No. administrative, no probative value —

Chen_deposition_prep_outline.docx Yes. witness preparation materials Work product

HR_handbook_v12.pdf No. stock policy, no factual nexus to the claims —

Draft_response_to_complaint.docx Yes. direct attorney work product; responsive on its face Work product

Illustrative matter. The chrome, columns, and answer format are the same screen you sign into.

IV. The flow

Open. Ask. Draft. Review.

Step 01

Open a matter.

Upload files, tag them, add notes. Invite collaborators with per-matter permissions. Every matter is its own walled-off workspace.
Step 02

Ask with context.

Chat with the files you choose. Filter by tag or folder. Add web search when you need current law. Every answer shows the source excerpt it came from.
Step 03

Draft in Word.

Bring the matter into Microsoft Word. Refine selected text, ask the matter agent, insert notes, and run Fact Check before you file.
Step 04

Review at scale.

When you need the same answer on every document, build a review table. Columns are text, yes/no, or date. The AI fills the grid; you audit and export to CSV.

V. The honest comparison

Built for the work, not for the enterprise sale.

Legacy platforms

Relativity · DISCO

Built pre-LLM; AI bolted on as an add-on.
Enterprise pricing and enterprise onboarding.
Processing fees, user fees, hosting fees, still.
Weeks to implement; months to train a team.

Outsourced review

Contract review teams

$0.50–$2.00 per document, per pass.
Turnaround measured in weeks.
Consistency varies reviewer to reviewer.
Client documents leave the firm.

LawGPT

AI-native. Self-serve.

For lawyers, by lawyers. Designed by people who've done the first-pass themselves.
Built on LLMs from day one, not bolted to them.
Transparent credit pricing. $170/month to start. No per-document fees.
Open a matter in minutes. First review in seconds.
Self-serve: sign in with email or Google and go.

VI. The ones you'll ask

Answers before the email.

Legal buyers ask the same questions in every demo. Here they are. Billing-specific ones live on the pricing page.

Is this privileged?

We treat every document as confidential by default. Humans on our team don't access your content except during a support request you initiate, or if we're investigating a concrete security incident involving your matter. Attorney-client privilege isn't a product feature; we operate on the assumption that anything you upload may be privileged.

Do you train AI models on our data?

No. Documents, prompts, and outputs are never used to train, fine-tune, or evaluate models, whether ours or a third party's. Inference runs against providers under agreements that prohibit training on API inputs, and we pass the same commitment through to you in the DPA.

Do I need to enter a card to get started?

Yes. Sign up with email or Google, create your workspace, and pick a plan. Stripe Checkout collects the card before your first billable action runs. Your monthly subscription credits cover chat, review, summaries, and storage; everything in the product bills against that one balance.

Can my whole firm use one workspace?

Yes. Workspace roles are owner, admin, member, and external. Matter-level roles are owner, editor, viewer, and external. An admin can invite a collaborator to a specific matter without giving them access to the rest of the workspace. Seats are included in each plan's allowance.

Is the Word add-in included?

Yes. LawGPT for Word is available with an active LawGPT subscription and works with Word on the web, Word for Windows, and Word for Mac. It uses the same workspaces, matters, notes, files, and chat threads as LawGPT on the web.

What happens to my documents if I cancel?

You keep access through the end of the paid period and can export reviews to CSV at any time. After cancellation your workspace and its content stay in place — reactivate the subscription whenever you're ready and pick up where you left off. To permanently delete a workspace, an owner triggers deletion from workspace settings; that action is immediate and irreversible.

Do we still need Relativity or DISCO?

If you're running billion-document productions with chain of custody requirements for regulators, yes, keep them. If you're a small or mid-size firm doing first-pass review on matters of a few thousand to a few hundred thousand documents, LawGPT replaces the first pass entirely, and you'd use eDiscovery platforms only for production cuts.

VII. Pricing

Two plans. One unit of usage.

A monthly credit allowance covers chat, review, summaries, and storage. One balance, one rate card.

Standard

Solo & small firms

$170 / month

1,500 credits / month
≈ 1,500 chat messages or review cells
≈ 500 AI summaries
≈ 7 GB stored for a month

See the full Standard plan

Premium

Mid-size firms reviewing at volume

$700 / month

7,500 credits / month
≈ 7,500 chat messages or review cells
≈ 2,500 AI summaries
≈ 37 GB stored for a month

See the full Premium plan

Need more credits? Buy a prepaid pack from the billing page anytime. Full rate card, pack pricing, and FAQ on the pricing page.

VIII. Security & data handling

What happens to your data. In plain English.

We don't train on your data. Ever.: Your documents, prompts, and outputs are never used to train our models or any third-party's. Written into every DPA.
Matter-scoped by default.: Workspace roles (owner, admin, member, external) plus per-matter permissions. No embeddings shared across matters. Audit log on every meaningful action.
Your data leaves when you do.: Export reviews to CSV, documents in their original formats, and the audit log at any time. Workspace deletion happens the moment an owner confirms it — there is no grace period.
Plain English over checkbox security.: SOC 2 attestation is on the roadmap, not done yet. We'll share the current control posture and prior pen-test results under NDA.
US data residency.: Primary storage, backups, and indices all stay in US regions on Azure. TLS everywhere, AES-256 at rest, managed keys.
DPA, BAA, and your paper.: Standard DPA and BAA available on request. Custom redlines go through a real human on our side, not a legal-ops queue.

Full details on the security page.

IX. Your next matter is waiting.

Pick a plan. Open a matter.

Sign up, choose Standard or Premium, and bring your documents, or start with a sample matter we've prepared.

Get started Talk to us first