LawGPT vs. ChatGPT: What’s the Difference?

After the launch of Open AI’s ChatGPT in 2022, a seemingly endless world of opportunity opened for legal professionals. Since then, a world of skepticism has similarly emerged.

Legal professionals quickly learned utilizing ChatGPT to ingest confidential and proprietary information created a host of issues – and profound legal implications. The American Bar Association has published guidance in an effort to help legal professionals navigate the changing ethical terrain.

Nonetheless, the test of time is proving AI is here to stay. Recently dubbed the “new legal powerhouse” by Reuters, legal professionals are strongly encouraged to get on board or risk being left behind.

“Lawyers who engage with AI, learn to use it effectively, and understand how it will affect their practice will position themselves to thrive in the new AI-driven landscape.”

While the pitfalls of ChatGPT limit legal professionals from applying it in the legal space, a new AI platform – Built by Lawyers, for Lawyers – has emerged.

 

LawGPT: Breaking it Down

Security

Most OpenAI models cannot offer stringent data protection, HIPPA compliance, and advanced encryption protocols. However, many enterprises have entrusted Microsoft with these tasks for years.

LawGPT is uniquely powered by Microsoft’s Azure OpenAI platform, offering unparalleled security that competitors simply can’t contend with.

All input information is housed in a private, self-managed data lake, allowing LawGPT users to add, manage, and delete data at their leisure, without the hassle of licensing or IT team oversight.

No Limitations

Most ChatGPT users encounter vast restrictions, particularly when it comes to file sizes, file types, and the number of files that can be uploaded per chat. Typically, there are also usage caps for both individual users and organizations.

LawGPT does not have these limitations.

Users and organizations select their plan catered to their firm’s needs and anticipated use. Files of all kinds – even ZIP, 7ZIP, and RAR files – are easily uploaded, allowing users to upload and index any file, even in its original folder structure.

Organization

With most ChatGPT models, user engagement begins and ends with a prompt.

Forward-thinking features most users crave – an interactive workspace, file repository, even structure and search capabilities – are virtually nonexistent.

With the attorney’s experience at the helm, LawGPT provides an organizational solution.

User permissions foster collaboration across case files. Designated roles allow users to (only) access the workspaces they are designated to.

File tagging and folder sorting organizes document scope in a clear, streamlined manner, allowing users to engage specific documents of a given case in specific ways.

Further, LawGPT allows users to revisit complex work in progress, all safely stored and easily accessible via their workspace.

 

Ready to introduce your firm to your newest legal partner?

Request a demonstration today.

Related Post ...

55% of Attorneys Are Worried About AI: Why?

Given negative use case pitfalls early on, accuracy concerns, and grey areas surrounding client confidentiality, it’s no surprise that legal professionals have been hesitant to lean into the rapidly evolving world of AI. In fact, according to Law.com, a 2023